ATS comparison

Treegarden vs Ashby: ATS Pricing and Hiring Workflows

Ashby may suit teams that need deeper sourcing, recruiting operations and analytics. Treegarden is worth evaluating when active-job pricing, unlimited user accounts and an optional HR module fit your buying criteria. Compare the same company size, hiring workload and product scope before choosing.

The questions that make the comparison useful

Compare the pricing unit, not just the headline price
Ashby publishes a Foundations plan priced by employee count, while Treegarden's ATS plans are priced by active jobs. Those starting prices are not like-for-like, so model the cost against the workforce and hiring activity you'll actually have.
Choose the recruiting depth you will actually use
Ashby publishes sourcing, recruiting-operations and integration capabilities that may matter to an integration-heavy team. Treegarden is worth evaluating when a clear ATS workflow, unlimited user accounts and published active-job pricing are the priority.
Decide whether HR belongs in this purchase
If post-hire workflows matter, assess them explicitly. Treegarden offers an optional HR module alongside its ATS. Ask each vendor how employee data, onboarding and HR workflows fit your existing systems before you buy.

Treegarden vs Ashby - side by side

Feature Treegarden Ashby
Published entry price Startup ATS: $299/mo equivalent, up to 10 active jobs Foundations: select company-size band and payment term for current price
Pricing model Active jobs, with unlimited user accounts Company-size band and payment term; confirm scope and quote
Post-hire HR scope Optional separately priced HR module Evaluate People Workflows and existing HR systems
Kanban pipeline Drag & drop Yes
AI candidate scoring Included Yes
Implementation Scope data, integrations and rollout in a demo Scope data, integrations and rollout with Ashby
Integrations Review the job boards and tools required for your workflow Published integration marketplace; verify required connections
Interview scheduling Built-in Built-in
Collaborative hiring Scorecards & notes Yes
Employee onboarding Available with the optional HR module Confirm current People Workflows scope
Time-off management Available with the optional HR module Confirm HR scope against your existing system
Commercial terms Annual commitment with monthly instalments available Review current Ashby plan terms

A 25-person US company with 8-10 open roles

Assume two recruiters and four hiring managers. The 8-10 roles are open at the same time, not annual hires or jobs created over the life of the account. Under Treegarden's published annual-commitment pricing, Startup ATS covers up to 10 active jobs at $299 per month equivalent; user accounts do not change that ATS price. Adding the separately priced HR Startup module for 25 employees makes the published ATS + HR equivalent $598 per month. Ashby's Foundations selector depends on the company-size band and payment term: request the current price for 25 employees and confirm what its recruiting package includes. An HRIS or other post-hire system should be priced separately if required. These are not identical product bundles, and a displayed $400 price is not a universal rate for every sub-100-person company.

Buyer checklist

1
Sourcing
Do you need outbound sequences, prospect pools or data enrichment? Confirm Ashby's plan entitlement and usage allowances.
2
Operations and analytics
Demo approvals, interview scheduling, reporting and permissions with real hiring-manager tasks.
3
Collaboration
Confirm access and any price implications for both recruiters and all four hiring managers.
4
HR handoff
Map employee-record transfer, onboarding ownership and integration costs before comparing ATS + HR totals.

Where each option fits

Treegarden: active-job pricing
Treegarden publishes ATS plans from $299, $499 or $899 per month equivalent. ATS pricing is tied to active jobs and includes unlimited user accounts. HR is a separate module, so you can price the workflow you need today.
Ashby: sourcing and recruiting operations
Ashby may be stronger when outbound sourcing, configurable operations, analytics and a broad integration marketplace are requirements. Ask for a 25-employee quote and demonstrate the exact workflows; Treegarden may be less suitable if those specialized capabilities are essential.
Treegarden: optional HR in the same platform
Treegarden may suit a team that wants ATS now and HR workflows in the same product later. The HR module is separately priced; compare it with your existing HRIS rather than assuming it is included in the ATS fee.

If a team needs advanced sourcing and recruiting analytics, Ashby's additional scope may justify its cost. If those tools would go unused and concurrent job count is predictable, Treegarden's published ATS capacity may be easier to budget. Neither is a good fit until required integrations, hiring-manager permissions and post-hire ownership are verified.

Compare scope, pricing units and rollout requirements

Last verified: October 14, 2026. Treegarden authored this comparison and sells one of the products discussed. We compared public Ashby pricing and feature information, its integration directory and Treegarden pricing. This is not a hands-on test or an independent endorsement. Confirm current plan entitlements, migration scope and integrations with each vendor.

1
Price unit
Ashby's Foundations price uses a company-size and term selector. Treegarden's Startup ATS is $299/mo equivalent for up to 10 active jobs under an annual commitment.
2
Recruiting depth
Ashby publishes an integration marketplace. List the sourcing, analytics and integrations your team must have and confirm plan availability.
3
HR scope
Treegarden's HR module is separately priced. Decide whether post-hire workflows are in scope now or should remain in your current HR system.
4
Rollout plan
Ask both vendors to define data exports, historical records, integrations, responsibilities and validation steps. There is no universal migration duration.

Capacity-based ATS plans

All core ATS features are available across the ATS plans. Tiers reflect active-job capacity, not user seats or feature gating. HR is separate. Prices are monthly equivalents under annual commitments, with monthly instalments available. Check current prices and terms.

Startup
$299 /mo equiv.
Up to 10 active jobs
  • Unlimited users
  • Full ATS pipeline
  • Optional HR module, priced separately
  • Job board integrations
  • Email templates
Book a demo
Scale
$899 /mo equiv.
Highest published active-job capacity; confirm current limits
  • Everything in Growth
  • Core ATS features remain available
  • Unlimited user accounts
  • Optional HR module priced separately
Book a demo

Frequently asked questions

Start with the hiring model you need. Ashby's public product material emphasizes recruiting operations, sourcing, analytics and integrations. Treegarden offers ATS plans priced by active jobs with unlimited user accounts, plus a separately priced HR module. Because the entry offers use different units, compare expected employee count, active jobs, required integrations and rollout scope before deciding.
Consider Treegarden if you value published ATS pricing based on active jobs, unlimited user accounts and the option to keep recruiting and HR in one platform. The HR module is a separate product decision, so evaluate its scope and price alongside the ATS rather than assuming it is bundled.
No. Treegarden offers ATS and HR as separate modules. The ATS Startup plan is listed from $299 per month equivalent under an annual commitment. Review the current HR plans and decide whether the post-hire workflows are needed for your team.
Ashby's Foundations price changes with the selected company-size band and payment term; the displayed $400 figure is not a price for every company under 100 employees. Treegarden lists Startup ATS at $299 per month equivalent for up to 10 active jobs under an annual commitment. Compare the same workforce, recruiting scope and term.
A migration plan should be scoped during a demo. The right plan depends on the data you export, historical records to retain, required integrations and how you want to stage a rollout. Confirm the fields, workflows, responsibilities and timing before committing to either platform.

Ready to compare the workflow in detail?

Use a demo to map your hiring process, integrations, active-job needs and optional HR requirements before you choose.